Red Carpet events and Galas allow celebrities to display their own sense of fashion and their personal wealth as well. Many of these stars tend to keep their style throughout the years, while others often choose to switch their clothing options from time to time. There have been many occasions when celebs have changed the course of fashion forever with the gowns or tuxedos they’ve donned, especially during the Academy Awards, and today, we’re going to take a look at the most timeless and posh red carpet appearances in Hollywood. Are you curious about what these stars opted to wear when they were at the apex of their glory and had an overflowing bank account? Let’s find out!

Audrey Hepburn 1954 Vs. 1992

Audrey Hepburn had always been characterized by class and elegance, and when she appeared at the Academy Awards to receive her Oscar for Best Actress in 1954, the stunning actress wore a white Givenchy dress with floral details on it. Almost four decades later, in 1992, she reappeared at the Academy Awards, but this time, as a presenter. Though everybody could see that time had passed, she hadn’t lost a bit of her glamor, rocking a pink dress which matched perfectly with her brilliant smile. While she was rich, having a $100-million net worth, she used most of her dividends to help UNICEF and people in need, proving she was a unique woman.

Elizabeth Taylor 1957 Vs. 2002

Elizabeth Taylor was the Golden Flag of Hollywood’s ‘Golden Age.’ One of the most well-recognized retro divas made her 1957 Academy Awards appearance wearing an elegant dress, accompanied by a jeweled tiara and the popular long gloves, which were a huge trend back then. The tiara was, in fact, a gift from the man next to her, Mike Todd, who was her third husband at the time. In 2002, she appeared at the 15th Annual Carousel of Hope Ball in Beverly Hills, with her fur trim and bright colors proving that despite her age, she was still a star. Well, she was a star with a colorful love life actually, as a huge portion of her $600-million net worth was probably used for her seven weddings! And, part of Taylor’s retirement investment was perhaps her sumptuous jewelry collection!

Sophia Loren 1963 Vs. 2015

The white gown with the rosette collar that was worn by Sophia Loren in 1963 showed everyone why she was considered the top female role model of her time. And while some would think that a star turning 80 would look less staggering, she proved them wrong in 2015, when she appeared in Cologne, Germany in an elegant red dress. She was 80 back then, but would you expect less from a woman like her? An Oscar is just one of the numerous awards she has won, and making money wasn’t hard for her then, with her looks and acting skills granting her a $75-million fortune now. Funny enough, when people want to judge someone’s beauty, they still make comparisons to Loren, even in 2018.

Dionne Warwick 1972 Vs. 2017

Singer Dionne Warwick wasn’t really fond of extravagant gowns, however, the tuxedos she wore both in 1972 and in 2017 were as posh as it gets, even if the most recent tuxedo wasn’t matched with a skirt, like in 1972. Though the iconic singer hasn’t lost her sense of elegance and style, she sure lost tons of cash over the years. In 2013, she had no option but to file for bankruptcy, even after decades of successful performances. Her current fortune is estimated to be around $10 million, and her taxes are a big problem, as she apparently failed to pay for them in recent years. But hope is not lost though, as her current live performances bring her almost $21K per month, and fortunately, she will soon recover financially.

Joan Collins 1950 Vs. 2016

Joan Collins rocked those elbow-long gloves in 1950, wearing this astounding white gown which showed her perfect shape. Almost seven decades later, she captivated everyone in the British Vogue Anniversary Gala, with her golden gown accompanied by gold jewelry. The ageless actress enjoys being in the spotlight after eras of success, and surely, younger talents could learn a thing or two from her experience and charisma. Collins’ having a $30-million fortune is absolutely no coincidence, as she starred in numerous blockbusters of her time, and apart from loads of cash, she also earned her own star on the famous Hollywood Walk of Fame.

Lauren Bacall 1955 Vs. 2010

Lauren Bacall was all about glamour, whether it was her 1955 appearance at the Academy Awards with her eye-catching gown, or her 2010 Vanity Fair Oscar Party appearance, with that all-black kind-of tuxedo revealing that even if she was 85 at the time, elegance ran in her blood. She made her acting debut on Broadway during the early ’40s, and it wasn’t long before talent agents brought her to Hollywood to become the next big thing. Unfortunately, Bacall passed away in 2014, when she was 89 years old. Her fortune was estimated at around $40 million and her last will was surely pages long. Luckily though, she was more than pleased to receive an Honorary Academy Award in 2009.

Debbie Reynolds 1958 Vs. 2015

Debbie Reynolds looked like an absolute princess with her shiny white gown when she appeared at the 1958 Academy Awards. Several years later, we saw her in the 21st Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards, with a far more different clothing option, posing next to her late celebrity daughter, Carrie Fisher. Apart from the heartbreaking story of her daughter’s death, Reynolds was in the epicenter of the famous Taylor-Fisher scandal. Her first husband, Todd Fisher, had an affair with Elizabeth Taylor which later became public, raising controversy among Hollywood circles and cinema fans. At least Reynolds had an estimated $85 million fortune at the time of her death, despite suffering a severe personal finance ruin in the late ’90s.

Faye Dunaway 1968 Vs. 2018

It seems that Faye Dunaway really loves black, and why wouldn’t she? She looked fabulous when she showed up in a black wrap dress and sleek hair back in 1968, and she was equally fabulous when she appeared at the most recent Academy Awards wearing a black gown which showed that she still got it, even if she’s in her late 70s. Though the actress has appeared in some movies as well as in TV series, she’s made most of her $40-million net worth through theatrical plays. People will never forget seeing her in American National Theater’s A Man For All Seasons in 1962. Moreover, her participation in Broadway’s Hogan’s Goat established her as a prominent actress. With her fortune, terms like ‘refinance rates’ or ‘mortgage’ would not be in her book

Lauren Hutton 1975 Vs. 2015

Lauren Hutton’s rainbow gown accompanied by a fur jacket was the typical elegant fashion style of the ’70s, and this beauty sure did know how to carry such an outfit. In 2015, when she participated in the Armani Party, she chose not to wear something that flamboyant, instead, she showed up in a very elegant midnight blue jacket and slim-fit trousers. While Hutton has landed roles in many successful movies, she proved to be much more prominent as a model, and she had some huge earnings over the years by collaborating with many cosmetics brands like Revlon, eventually ending up with a $20-million fortune. Perhaps with the help of an investment advisor, Hutton has put up her cosmetics line called Good Stuff, as she does know all about looking good.

Farrah Fawcett 1978 Vs. 2004

When Farrah Fawcett appeared in the 1968 Academy Awards, her golden dress made everyone lose their minds. The dress became that popular that many replicas of it were released, with fans all across the world buying them. However, when she appeared at the 2004 VMA, she wore a much simpler dress, with small floral details on it. Fawcett came to prominence as a Charlie’s Angel, and to this day, most people (probably males) remember her and her blonde hair saving the world. In fact, she reached her peak during the ’90s when she was regarded as one of the most famous TV actresses. The result? A $20-million net worth before her unfortunate death in 2009 due to anal cancer. We have no information though if her heirs benefited from a life insurance.

Debbie Allen 1982 Vs. 2017

Debbie Allen’s gown in the 1982 Academy Awards was the epitome of ’80s fashion, with its thigh-high slit stealing the show. Though her 2017 appearance at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts was just as elegant, it wasn’t equally extravagant, with the renowned actress and choreographer opting for something less flamboyant but equally elegant. Though people mostly recognize her as a successful actress, both on Broadway and in the TV series Fame, Allen is just as successful a choreographer, having worked on numerous projects. Following her retirement, she founded her own dance school in Georgia to sustain her $3-million fortune.

Daryl Hannah 1988 Vs. 2014

The 1988 Academy Awards was a pleasant event for people who liked Daryl Hannah (pretty much everyone), as they witnessed her wearing that amazing gold dress and the popular elbow-long gloves. In 2014, she walked down Vienna Filmball’s red carpet wearing a gorgeous blue gown, while she had picked a red one the night before. The stunning blonde beauty has had a remarkable film portfolio, with leading roles in numerous blockbusters like Blade Runner, Splash, and Kill Bill. Despite being in her mid-50s, she looks ageless, and she knows how to take care of herself, especially with that $20-million fortune of hers.

Olivia de Havilland 1947 Vs. 2011

Hollywood’s Golden Age wouldn’t have been the same without Olivia de Havilland. You can see her receiving her 1957 Best Actress Oscar in her light-blue organza gown accentuated with handmade floral details. The right picture shows her arrival at the French Cesar film Awards in 2011. Astoundingly, she was 95 at the time, but her all-black outfit matched her timeless glamor. De Havilland is most known for her remarkable performance in To Each His Own, and throughout her career, she has won three Oscars and numerous other awards, ending up with a $20-million fortune. She is past 100 now, and in all likelihood, she has already outlived her life insurance policy expectations.

Sidney Poitier 1964 Vs. 2014

Sidney Poitier has been an iconic actor both in Hollywood and for the Bahamian-American community. He was the first black actor to receive a Best Actor Academy Award, in 1964, and he celebrated it by wearing a white bow tie and an elegant black coat. Fifty years later, the red carpet welcomed him once more, this time, as he was accompanied by his daughter Sydney Tamiia Poitier, where he wore almost the same outfit but with a black bow tie. His iconic role in Lilies of The Field was just the beginning of a movie series mostly racial-themed, raising awareness about black rights in America. At the same time, his personal finance exploded, reaching $25 million.

Barbra Streisand 1969 Vs. 2016

One of the most renowned actresses and singers, Barbra Streisand, graced the 1969 Academy Awards with her Arnold Scaasi outfit, which stayed in history as one of the unique red carpet appearances. In 2016, she appeared at the Tony Awards wearing a black blazer with a maxi skirt, and she never seems to stop wowing us with her one-of-a-kind and expensive clothing options. Decades of experience and success have helped Streisand accumulate a massive $400-million net worth and likely a huge investment banking account, and yet, retirement doesn’t seem to be an option right now. Having released 33 solo albums, she recently toured the world, and she still appears in movies every now and then. For certain, her investment

Diana Ross 1973 Vs. 2017

Diana Ross was the lucky presenter of the 1973 Academy Awards, and she chose a unique outfit for the event. Ross showed up in a menswear-turned-glamorous silk tuxedo, a handmade piece from Bob Mackie. Her 2017 appearance at the American Music Awards was just as unique, this time though, she didn’t wear a tuxedo, but a one-of-a-kind black gown with a special headpiece, made by Vivienne Westwood. Her girl group The Supremes was an enormous hit back in the ’60s, and she then followed a solo career that made her even more famous, and of course, rich.  By rich, we mean $250-million-in-her-bank-account rich. 

Ann-Margret 1974 Vs. 2010

Ann-Margret wanted her red carpet appearance to be remembered forever, thus, she showed up at the 1974 Academy Awards with a bizarre black sheath, which also covered her head. In 2010, it was her time to shine again at the Annual Primetime Emmy Awards, and she seems to love tight dresses, sporting a black gown with some pearls on her neck. Her contract with the RCA changed her checking account forever, as from then on, she landed roles in many notable musical films and stage shows. The outcome? A $20-million fortune, which guarantees that she will live an opulent and home-loan-refinance-free life.

Jack Nicholson 1976 Vs. 2010

Jack Nicholson has proven numerous times that he’s one of the coolest actors in Hollywood, and when his role in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest granted him an Oscar in 1976, he showed up at the red carpet with a slick tuxedo and some aviator glasses on. In 2012, he attended the 40th AFI Life Achievement event wearing a black tuxedo once more, as he seems comfortable wearing a tux at formal events. An illustrious acting career with some of the most iconic roles and an insane $400-million net worth mean that you can pretty much wear anything you desire, anywhere, anytime. His choice of clothes definitely doesn’t mean that he lacks style or elegance because he has both, plus excellent acting chops to his credit.

Diane Keaton 1978 Vs. 2017

Diane Keaton doesn’t settle for less than super-expensive designer clothes when it comes to her red carpet appearances. In fact, she has claimed that her clothing muse had always been Karl Lagerfeld, and since her success in Annie Hall, she had shown the same look on her 1978 Oscar win. Almost 40 years later, her appearance at the 2017 API Life Achievement Award Gala was once again defined by class, this time not with a jacket though, but with a jacket-like dress that showcased her style. Keaton’s biggest success has always been Annie Hall, but she has participated in other famous movies as well, like Mad Money and Looking For Mrs. Goodbar. And so, a $50 million in her checking account should come as no surprise.

John Travolta 1978 Vs. 2017

The Disco-Master proves to be another huge fan of tuxedos, and in 1978, his Academy Awards appearance was tuxedo-tastic. Next tuxedo station: the 2017 Golden Globes event, when his black tuxedo and bow tie were now less shiny and more elegant and mature. He eventually reached a $170-million net worth after decades of acting and appearing in some of the most iconic movies Hollywood has ever produced. His performance in Grease is still praised by movie fans, while others will never forget his acting talent as it was portrayed in Pulp Fiction. Needless to say, this man has been an acting A-lister for many years now and he absolutely deserves it. Incidentally, an interesting part of his talent “portfolio” is his being a licensed pilot.

Sigourney Weaver 1981 Vs. 2016

Sigourney Weaver might be most known as a fierce alien exterminator, but her red carpet appearances have been remarkable. In 1982, she hit the red carpet with a white jumpsuit that wowed everyone, and recently, she won the Icon of the Year Award in 2016, presented by Glamour’s Women of the Year Awards, thanks to her impressive green gown which accentuated her silhouette. She takes credit for assisting the Alien franchise make it big with her astounding performance, and she made most of her $50-million fortune through those movies. However, you can witness her acting chops in the more recent movies as well – Avatar and its sequels. 

Jane Seymour 1981 Vs. 2017

Bond girls are known to be extravagant and drop-dead gorgeous, and Jane Seymour is no exception to that. Her shiny red gown at the 1981 Academy Awards left the male population speechless, while her light-blue dress during the 2017 Open Hearts Gala confirmed that elegance is something that defines her, no matter how many years have passed. Bond girls are also known for another thing, and that is their loaded savings accounts. Her $90-million fortune is mostly the result of her appearance in the Live and Let Die Bond film and her performance in the famous drama Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman.

Jessica Lange 1983 Vs. 2017

Jessica Lange’s red carpet appearances always had a designer-clothing touch, with her 1983 Valentino gown stealing the show (apart from her Oscar win of course). In the 2017 Emmy Awards, Lange clearly hasn’t given up on luxury and designer clothes, as she wore a Gucci gown with some Jimmy Choo shoes. Although most of her dividends were the result of her fruitful acting career, her $15-million fortune benefited a lot from her modeling career as well, as her rocking body helped her get on the catwalks with ease. Lange is now pushing 70, and apart from the fact that she still looks gorgeous, retiring doesn’t seem to be any closer. Just check out her recent American Horror Story appearance.

Anjelica Huston 1986 Vs. 2013

Seeing how celebrities change their clothing options over the years is fascinating. Anjelica Huston showed up at the 1986 Academy Awards with a stunning Tzetzi Ganev emerald gown, and when she received her award, the crowd couldn’t help but stand in awe at her beauty and elegance. However, her 2013 NBC Universal Winter TCA Tour Day appearance was much more different, as she opted for a less feminine outfit, wearing a classic black suit and a ruffled blouse. Her $50-million fortune went straight to her bank account when she played in Prizzi’s Honor, and throughout the years, she has appeared in numerous acclaimed movies, showing why people consider her a fantastic actress.

James Stewart 1942 Vs. 1965

James Stewart is one of the oldest stars on our list, and his 1942 Oscars appearance was marked by the dark age of WWII. That was why he wore an Army Uniform after all, as he also served in the US Army as a Brigadier General. Withal, his 1965 outfit was much different, the dark times of war were behind and he rocked his posh black tuxedo with a black bow tie. His contribution to Hollywood’s Golden Era was tremendous, and the legacy he had left behind is unforgettable. Imagine that despite his participation in WWII and the Vietnam War, he starred in more than 90 movies. He passed away in 1997, with a $30-million fortune at the time.

Christopher Walken 1978 Vs. 2016

Well, the ’70s were all about mustaches and this legendary actor didn’t miss the chance to show his during the 1978 Academy Awards, with his black tuxedo and somewhat huge bow tie. The years have passed, and his 2016 outfit in the Tribeca Film festival was slightly different. He kept the black jacket on but opted for a dark green shirt, which clearly added to his prestigious look. Of course, his elegant clothing options are fueled by his $50-million fortune, something that was derived from his fruitful acting career with leading roles in classic films like Pulp Fiction, Annie Hall, and Catch me if You Can. Walken might face 100 problems but surely, home refinance won’t ever be one of them.

Molly Ringwald 1987 Vs. 2017

OK, the ’80s were a time full of glamor and extravagance, but Molly Ringwald’s 1987 appearance was truly different, as she opted for a simple, yet sparkling, tight black dress. The Planned Parenthood’s 100th Anniversary Gala in 2017 was Ringwald’s next big red carpet appearance, something which she matched with her bright red dress, only this time, a not-so-tight one though. Her outfits might not be the most expensive out there, but they are beautiful, and if she wanted to break the bank in clothing, her $11-million net worth could definitely afford it. Ringwald faced more success in her TV roles, like Facts of Life and Diff’rent Strokes, which made her an American TV favorite.

Paul McCartney 1974 Vs. 2016

Paul McCartney’s Live And Let Die granted the James Bond franchise its first-ever Academy Award nomination for Best Original Song, and the renowned bassist and singer celebrated it with a white jacket, black shirt, and something that we prefer not to remember as a mullet. His 2016 appearance at the premiere of The Beatles: Eight Days A Week was much more elegant and a bit casual as well. His career with The Beatles was iconic, and he’s regarded as one of the most influential artists of all time. While his net worth in 1966 was estimated to be around $3.4 million, it has now skyrocketed to $1.2 billion, and that was more than enough to cut his mullet apparently. With that money, his real estate investments must be scattered all across the globe.

Liza Minnelli 1968 Vs. 2010

White daisies were the perfect detail for Liza Minnelli’s 1968 Academy Award ceremony, as she was indeed a flower that had finally blossomed. Her green gown was totally different though compared to her 2010 charity event appearance, where she sported a black military-inspired outfit that pretty much shocked everyone – she’s a star after all. Coming from obscurity and performances in nightclubs as a young woman, Minnelli took over Hollywood with her Broadway and film performances, and in fact, she was the first woman to win an Oscar while her parents had won one, too. No wonder she ended up with a $50-million net worth! Her role in New York, New York alongside Robert DeNiro is an absolute classic. 

Julie Andrews 1968 Vs. 2015

Our beloved Mary Poppins star shook the 1968 Academy Awards with her staggering black gown with characteristic sheer sleeves. Almost 50 years later, during her appearance in the annual Opening Gala Season of Los Angeles, she opted for something different and more mature – a velvet blue jacket with matching trousers. Julie Andrews has left her mark in the acting industry by starring in the iconic musical films Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music. In fact, those movies proved to be so successful that Andrews amassed a $35-million net worth (a comfortable retirement fund, you’ll agree) in a really rough financial time in the US. We wouldn’t expect anything less though from a star whose movies are watched by people across the globe even in our days.

Spike Lee 1990 Vs. 2015

Though Spike Lee didn’t go for something extravagant at the 1990 Academy Awards, he did manage to steal the show with his one-of-a-kind Kente Cloth scarf. His Star Wars: The Force Awakens premiere appearance was another story though, with his grey jacket and funny-looking t-shirt being in the spotlight once more. What did you expect from a man who named his production company 40 Acres And A Mule anyway? Financing a business was Lee’s best decision, and he managed to direct some of the biggest blockbusters we have seen, like Malcolm X and Inside Man. We would be lying if we said that we don’t eagerly await his next red carpet appearance.

Jacqueline Bisset 1976 Vs. 2017

Nobody has ever worn a gown similar to the one that Jacqueline Bisset rocked in the 1976 Oscars, and that high neck detail with her one shoulder uncovered was truly unique and alluring. Comparing this to her 2017 appearance in the Cannes Film festival, you can see that Bisset hasn’t lost her glamor, despite opting for something conservative this time. Originally starting as a ballet dancer, Bisset had her first earnings by working as a part-time model. She eventually took a shot at acting, and she never looked back. Her $20-million net worth might be attributed mainly to her role as Miss Goodthighs in the iconic James Bond film, Casino Royale.

Cher 1973 Vs. 2015

Cher is an absolute fashion diva, and she proved it during the 1973 Oscars, where she showed up with a belly dancer dress which later inspired pop icons like Britney Spears. Her 2015 Costume Institute Benefit Gala appearance showed that she’s no longer a little girl, but the multi-colored sequins on her gown also showed that she won’t settle for something normal either. Her long and successful career, both with former husband Sonny Chaz and as a solo artist, resulted in her in having a $360-million fortune, which was largely complemented by prime real estate investments. Her mansions in Malibu and other places are truly extravagant and they are proof of her wealth.

Goldie Hawn 1971 Vs. 2017

Goldie Hawn is an all-American favorite who stole the show in the 1971 Oscars ceremony with her floral gown. Her 2017 Golden Globe gown was far less girly though, something that was just natural considering that she’s now in her 70s, but have you ever that beautiful? She expanded her market outlook in the acting industry, as she originally started off as an actress but then also turned to directing and movie producing, thus ending up with a $60-million fortune, something that makes her partner Kurt Russel more than happy. Her gorgeous daughter Kate Hudson continues to remind us of our beloved Goldie.

Winona Ryder 1990 Vs. 2017

Winona Ryder’s clothing choices both in the 1990 Academy Awards and 2017 were practically the same: a head-turning all-black strapless gown made by Viktor & Rudolph. Ryder is known for not opting for too extravagant stuff, and we have to say that less is more, in her case at least. The renowned actress came to prominence by starring in Beetlejuice and then went on to appear in numerous iconic movies like Edward Scissorhands and Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Ryder sits on an $18-million net worth, which she still grows by appearing in the famous TV series Stranger Things since 2016.

Robert Redford 1980 Vs. 2015

Looking at Robert Redford during the 1980 Academy Awards, we can all agree that tuxedos with a black bow tie definitely makes him look handsome. He probably knows that himself, thus, when he showed up at Alice Tully Hall in 2015, he wore a tuxedo again, but this time, accompanied by a black tie. He probably buys the most expensive ties after all, especially after his breakthrough role in The Sundance Kid, which resulted in his rise to stardom, in 1969. Fifty years later, Redford can enjoy any deluxe house he wants, as his $170-million net worth is more than enough to buy anything he desires. He’s considered to be a true icon of the vintage American cinema. Redford’s personal finance strategy could assure him of a comfortable retirement one day.

George Clooney 1986 Vs. 2017

Like really, George Clooney, what were you thinking when you wore that in that 1986 picture? His outfit reminds us of someone who forgot to take his pajamas off before going to work, but luckily, as Clooney’s credit report grew, so did his closet. When he appeared at the Suburbicon movie premiere in a black tuxedo, many women gasped for air for he looked just dapper. Clooney started hitting some serious leading roles in the ’90s, and before he even knew it, he had to search for the best wealth management adviser around to keep track of his $500-million fortune. He now uses all that wealth to live a luxurious life alongside his wife Amal Clooney and their kids. Like most stars, Cloney’s investment portfolio is also something enviable, but that’s another story.

Will Smith 1988 Vs. 2017

Will Smith was the iconic Fresh Prince of Bel-Air for a reason, as his style and charisma captivated us all, despite that 1988 picture which shows him struggling to match his jacket and tie. Some years later, he has become an absolute Hollywood legend, and he obviously opts for some more costly clothes like that electric blue jacket and dashing tie. He doesn’t mind going shopping all day long after all, as Smith now sits on a $260-million fortune. A fortune well deserved actually, if you consider that he has starred in many an iconic film like I, Robot, Hancock, and many others films that made millions both for the actors involved and their directors.

Cindy Crawford 1991 Vs. 2017

Does Cindy Crawford even need an introduction? Her 1991 gown in the Fifth Annual California Industry Friends of AIDS Project reminded us why she was considered one of the most beautiful women in the world during the ’80s and the ’90s. However, her black dress in the 2017 Marie Claire’s Image Maker Awards proved that she’s still steamming hot. Apart from her long and lucrative modeling career, Crawford now has her own cosmetics line called Meaningful Beauty, and she seems to be her own financial advisor – staying an A-lister with her $100-million fortune. Her teenage daughter, Kaia Gerber, is ready to take on the modeling world as well. Beauty runs in this family’s veins.

Rita Moreno 1962 Vs. 2018

If you want to know what confidence means, take a look at Puerto Rican-born actress Rita Moreno. When she received her Academy Award in 1962, she wore a half-black, half-gold gown with flowers on its skirt. To everyone’s surprise, when she showed up at the 2018 Oscars, she rocked the same dress, despite the fact that she is now in her late 80s!. In fact, this time, it was strapless, too. What a woman! When she moved to New York during her childhood, she probably needed a loan to pay for her dancing lessons expenses, but after a series of star roles and dancing performances, she now lives a luxurious life with her $25-million fortune.